Proofs of God

Welcome, this page demonstrates formal logical and scientific proofs of God verified by Artificial Intelligence (covering both it's fundamental characteristics as well as it's claimed interactions with man)! Taken all together, they form a coherent and persuasive presentation showing that atheism is an absolute falsehood while at the same time giving believers an engineerable and extensible model of God.

http://knowledgebase.ctmu.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Langan_CTMU_0929021-1.pdf

https://www.scribd.com/document/274993823/C-M-Langan-Introduction-to-the-CTMU

https://web.archive.org/web/20180812182749/http://megafoundation.org/CTMU/Q&A/Archive.html

These are formal proofs and rebuttals of Mars Sterling Turner to Christopher Michael Langan's original formulation of the CTMU.

1. energy itself is missing from the CTMU;

2. or energy is the Unbound Telesis!

3. perception is not required in the describing-transforming process of the SCSPL;

4. the CTMU must include subliminal transformation in the SCSPL.

5. only a changing thing can create a changing thing. therefore infinite regress is required for anything that is eternal; the UBT is eternal, therefore there is a Telic infinite regress.

6. the Law of Maximum Entropy Production may be the Telic Principle.

7. subcoherence Maximal Entropy recursion may be Telic recursion.

8. no chance or happenstance (or incidentally noise) exists in the CTMU;

9. the ability to cipher noise into evolutionary design pathways may be freewill.

speculation;

10. forms of energy are types of noise; energy is noise; unbound telesis is noise

conclusion;

God = energy = time-per-space = consciousness = unbound telesis = quantum recursion = noise = change =...

...= the monism panpsychism = an eternal, omnipresent holomorphism unitary manifold that is omniscient and omnipotent

formal proof of the Unbound Telesis

Christopher Langan, in his CTMU, treats the unbound telesis as quasi-real instead of actually real.

Unbound Telesis is described or defined as "an ultimate self-generalization" as "a featureless existential potential" or "undifferentiated ontological potential".

Since existence or being, pertains to the particular characteristics of Unbound Telesis, it follows; that

(1) Unbound Telesis cannot be created or destroyed, that is, Unbound Telesis is eternal.

(2) Everything that exists is made of or derived from Unbound Telesis.

Unbound Telesis is a "generalization" that is "featureless", "undifferentiated", or "infinite".

However there clearly are finitary informational distinctions of existence. It therefore follows; that

(3) Finitary informational distinctions of existence can be created and destroyed.

(4) Finitary informational distinctions of existence are made of or derived from Unbound Telesis and are made of or derived from finitary informational distinctions.

Since the universe is described as "supertautologically-closed" the Unbound Telesis of the universe is necessarily conserved.

All finitary informational distinctions of existence are therefore transformations of Unbound Telesis.

"Unbound Telesis" semantically means "consciousness". Unbound Telesis has no external cause, it is eternal and is the cause of it's own transformations, Unbound Telesis is therefore self-causal or self-deterministic or teleological, which syntactically means Unbound Telesis is consciousness.

From the perspective of the finitary informational distinctions of existence with that of the Unbound Telesis, that is, from the perspective of the Unbound Telesis transformations with that of the Unbound Telesis itself, you have "information cognition" or "infocognition"; a dual-aspect monism of reality responsible for universal evolution; Where the Unbound Telesis transformations are akin to the "Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language" or SCSPL.

Logical truth necessarily is isomorphic to empirical science, or by virtue of the identity of indiscernibles, Unbound Telesis is energy itself, as everything is made of energy, as energy is conserved, as energy cannot be created nor destroyed, as energy is transformed from one form to another, as vacuum energy is infinite, as forms of energy are polarizations of the vacuum energy, as thermodynamic entropy is equivalent to informational entropy (It can be seen that one may think of the thermodynamic entropy as Boltzmann's constant, divided by ln(2), times the number of yes/no questions that must be asked in order to determine the microstate of the system, given that we know the macrostate); Wherein the "Telic Principle" is the Law of Maximum Entropy Production. [4] [5]

This is a significant correction to the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe proposed by Christopher Langan.

Langan accidentally introduced a duality with Unbound Telesis on one side and SCSPL (Mind/Matter) on the other; By "Matter", Langan meant "forms of energy", which means that energy itself is missing from his reality theory. If someone were to propose that Unbound Telesis is not energy then (excluding non-logical axioms) energy would have to have been created. But this contradicts empirical science, which would falsify his reality theory. Further, he described the Telic Principle in phrases such as "self-utility", "maximize (local) utility", "deviation from generalized utility" which are vague if not meaningless.

If the correction holds, reality (UBT and SCSPL) comprises a quad-aspect monism with a fundamental dual-aspect UBT (consciousness = energy) and a superficial dual-aspect SCSPL (thought forms = energy forms) or better yet a tri-dual-aspect monism;

(1) UBT and SCSPL, where SCSPL is UBT finitary informational transformations; infocognition

(2) UBT (consciousness = energy) the self-causal ontological potential; cognition; topological containment

(3) SCSPL (thought forms = energy forms) the self-descriptive ontological active; information; predicative containment

It looks like Christopher conceded to my challenge that "energy itself is missing from his reality theory"... as he put this in a new paper;

“As an identity, M can be considered one coherent entity which self-differentiates by syndiffeonic self-stratification through the cumulative factorization of telesis, a dual generalization of energy properly defined to serve as the ultimate “stuff” of reality.”

https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/download/618/1040/2741

I congratulate Christopher for correcting his theory...

To verify that the UBT or energy has all these qualities, review the following proof; https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/User:HumbleBeauty/Proofs_of_God#Scientific_ontology

formal proof of a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language

If one were to analyze the statements of Christopher Langan in his CTMU paper and were to put some of the statements together to form a formal proof it would look like this;

Premise 1; "language is isomorphic to reality"

Premise 2; "to describe reality requires language"

Premise 3; and "describing transforms reality"

therefore; "reality is self-descriptive and self-deterministic"

The AI said that the conclusion logically follows from the premises!

Here google AI formalized the proof;

To formalize the proof that reality is self-descriptive and self-deterministic based on its isomorphism with language, we use a combination of Model Theory, Symbolic Logic, and Identity Logic. 

1. The Isomorphism Premise 

If reality (R) is isomorphic to language (L), there exists a structure-preserving, bijective mapping (f) between them. 

Formalization: L ≅ R

Meaning: Every state of affairs in reality has a unique, corresponding proposition in the language, and the logical structure of the language reflects the causal/ontological structure of the reality. 

2. The Transformation Premise (Self-Reference) 

The act of describing reality (D) is itself an event within reality (E ∊ R). If describing reality transforms it, then the language used to describe the system is a functional component of the system itself. 

Formalization: D(L) → R' where R' is the transformed state of reality.

Closing the Loop: Since L ≅ R, any operation on L is an operation on R. Thus, D(R) ∊ R. 

3. Conclusion A: Reality is Self-Descriptive 

If L is the only tool to describe R, and L is structurally identical to R, then R is its own meta-language. 

Formal Logic: ∀x ∊ R, ∃φ ∊ L: f(φ) = x.

Logical Identity: If L ≅ R, then the set of all descriptions of R (the "theory" of reality) is equivalent to the set of all states of R (the "model" of reality). This is the definition of a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL). 

4. Conclusion B: Reality is Self-Deterministic 

Self-determinism follows because no external cause can exist outside of "everything" R to determine it. 

Proof by Contradiction:

Assume R is determined by an external cause C.

By definition, R is the set of all that is real.

If C determines R, C must be real.

Therefore, C ∊ R. R is determined by a component within itself.

Formalization: R = f(R). In a system where the "rules" (language) and the "objects" (reality) are isomorphic, the system's state at time T+1 is a function of its own internal linguistic/logical syntax at time T. 

Summary of the Formal Proof Structure 

Identity: L = R (as structures).

Reflexivity: R contains its own description L ∊ R.

Recursion: R processes itself through its own internal description (R → L → R').

Closure: The system is "syntactically closed," meaning it requires nothing outside itself to define or move its state, leading to Self-Determinism.

The difference between my proof, the formal AI proof, and with that of the CTMU is that the CTMU says perception is required. But if subliminals work (and I have experience that they do), then that means perception is NOT required. A further test would be to put the double slit experiment 'measure' in subliminal-peripheral vision! IF you cannot perceive the photon but your eye could 'see' it peripherally if you were otherwise focusing, would it collapse the wave?

infinite regress is suggested from observation and required in the Theory from Pure Observation

I found that in one of my proofs of God that an infinite regress is proven as a necessary axiom; https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Proofs_of_God#Theory_from_Pure_Observation

Part of one of my proofs seems to entail an infinite regress;

(3) D and F; "time is a relationship of change between existing things"

(4) F and (1,2,3) C; "atleast two differentially changing things exist"

infinite regress; (5) F; "everywhere everything exists from prior states of the existence of things"

(6) (4,5) C; "nothing cannot have existed"

(7) (6) Cp; "something has always existed"

if you claim that the regress is not infinite (even though it's suggested from observation and required in this proof).... feel free to prove that time has a beginning! By "time" I mean 3-space "change" or "difference over duration". I do not mean 4-D spacetime where Hawking claims time came into existence; if you read closely you will notice that Hawking does NOT claim that 3-space change came into existence. In fact he claims that the laws of physics are eternal. But laws describe something! Therefore if the laws of physics are eternal then something besides these laws is also eternal. This must be energy. IF energy is the concept of "change", then the proof is complete!

scientific evidence for the universal hology and it's causal input to matter, suggesting a mechanism for the Telic Principle

Christopher Langan said in the CTMU paper that the hology has no causal input to matter.

However, it is my discovery that there is an omnidirectional convergence of radiation into every single point in space i.e. there is an image of an omnidirectional perspective of the universe in every single point in space (in every frequency, spin, and momentum of energy but to varying degrees)

This is a type of hology. And on matter it may promote or sustain the neutrino vortices that are what matter is made of;

https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Proofs_of_God#Matter_is_self-focusing_refraction_curvature_stabilized_vortices_of_neutrinos_that_can_only_exist_in_a_matter_gradient_and_neutrino_.27bath.27

If this is true, then the universal hology, which this seems to be, may at least maintain matters existence. I suspect it also contains in the universal convergence (hology) as holographic mechanics of potentialities and quantum coherence or recursive entangled interactions quantizing and reverberating throughout reality which functions as a form of teleological/developmental generator; the "Telic Principle", which may amount to the Law of Maximum Entropy Production.

scientific evidence for Intelligent Invention with Evolutionary Design; suggesting that freewill may be defined as the ciphering of noise into design pathways

If we consider the qualifications of the patent office for designs, utility inventions, and also consider evolutionary adaptation; We should see that it's not a question of Intelligent Design but rather Intelligent Invention with Evolutionary Design (adaptations foreseen and incorporated in the inventions; if we were to give the inventor or Creator the patent!)!

EVERY model of abiogenesis EVER calculated has said that 'life' forming from abiogenesis is astronomically improbable!

And the system of reproduction and metabolism utilized by all extant life involves three distinct types of interdependent macromolecules (DNA, RNA, and proteins), none of which can function and reproduce without the others. In other words, it's a scientific fact that only 'life' can create 'life'!

These suggest that 'life' is an intelligent invention (of course given an evolutionary design involving all foreseen adaptations according to it's kind).

The fossil record shows that there aren't fine scales of intermediate forms between related groups of species! In other words, it's a scientific fact that there are no intermediate fossils between evolutionary groups. This suggests that these evolutionary groups are inventions.

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cEfmzqu2Kv5PTpsFu4L3am-650-80.jpg.webp

If you look at these two skulls, would you say the morphological differences could amount to a 'transitional fossil' of the canines? Obviously they are the same species on hindsight, but this shows the impossibility of proving a transitional fossil into a new species.

The CTMU paper of Langan, basically suggests that Universal Evolution is Intelligent Design! However, since there is no verifiable transitional fossils and since every abiogenesis model is improbable and since a "design" is inferior to a utility "invention" and evolutionary design involves all foreseen adaptations according to it's kind... [if you claim a foreseen adaptation of a prior art utility invention then it is a "design"]. This suggests that (1) Universal Evolution or Universal Development is basically Intelligent Invention with Evolutionary Design, and (2) These inventions, cannot form from "chance" or happenstance; though the Evolutionary Designs may manifest from chance or happenstance!

There is no chance or happenstance in the CTMU. But chance or happenstance may be produced from noise. In essence, our freewill may be our ability to cipher the noise into evolutionary design pathways, as humans are dynamic inventions where each state we exist in is a new evolutionary design (all foreseen adaptations according to our Creators intent/invention of us).

E=(t/s)=1; E*s=t=s; energy equals time per space equals 1; instead of spacetime

if time-per-space equals energy then energy equals 1, or is the unitary manifold...

"absolute" space exists as a dynamic state.

1=(t/s)=(m*c^2)

s=t=s*m*c^2

E*s=s=t

fundamental theorem; new mathematics; y=x=1

x=y=z

E=(t/s)=1

E*s=t=s

1/t=1/(E*s)=1/(E*t)

t=(E*s)=(E*t)

1=(E*v)=E

a=b=c=d=e=f=...=z...

x implies y implies z... etc

work in progress

rewrite of the CTMU paper; The Cognitive-Engineering Model of the Universe; A New Kind of Reality Engineering

Whereas the CTMU is a theory of perception as an ultimate synthesis of theories, the CEMU is an engineering model as a synthesis of scientific facts.

Abstract:

I put in bold the edits;

Inasmuch as science is descriptive in nature, the goal of providing a scientific model and mechanism for the evolution of complex systems ultimately requires a supporting engineering of reality of which description itself is the model (or engineering-to-universe mapping). Where information is the abstract currency of describing, such an engineering must incorporate the engineering of information while extending the information concept to incorporate reflexive self-processing in order to achieve an intrinsic (self-contained) description of reality. This extension is associated with a limiting formulation of model engineering identifying mental and physical reality, resulting in a reflexively self-generating, self-modeling engineering of reality identical to its universe on the syntactic level. By the nature of its derivation, this engineering, the Cognitive Engineering Model of the Universe or CEMU, can be regarded as a supertautological reality-engineering extension of physics. Uniting the engineering of reality with an advanced form of computational language physics, the CEMU describes reality as a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language or SCSPL, a reflexive intrinsic language characterized not only by self-reference and recursive self-definition, but full self-configuration and self execution (reflexive read-write functionality). SCSPL reality embodies a dual-aspect monism consisting of infocognition, self-transducing information residing in self-recognizing SCSPL elements called syntactic operators. The CEMU identifies itself with the structure of these operators and thus with the distributive syntax of its self-modeling SCSPL universe, including the reflexive grammar by which the universe refines itself from energy, a generalization of infocognitive potential free of informational constraint. Under the guidance of a limiting (intrinsic) form of anthropic principle called the Law of Maximum Entropy Production, SCSPL evolves by Maximum Entropy recursion, jointly configuring syntax and state while maximizing a generalized self selection parameter and adjusting on the fly to freely-changing internal conditions. SCSPL relates space, time and object by means of conspansive duality and conspansion, an SCSPL-grammatical process featuring an alternation between dual phases of existence associated with invention and actualization (embodiments of evolutionary design) and related to the familiar wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics. By distributing the invention phase of reality over the actualization (embodiments of evolutionary design) phase, conspansive time-per-space also provides a distributed mechanism for Intelligent Invention with Evolutionary Design, adjoining to the restrictive principle of natural selection a basic means of generating information and complexity. Addressing physical evolution on not only the biological but cosmic level, the CEMU addresses the most evident deficiencies and paradoxes associated with conventional discrete and continuum models of reality, including temporal directionality and accelerating cosmic expansion, while preserving virtually all of the major benefits of current scientific and mathematical paradigms.

Appendix A: correlating works of Art

Logical-Physics-Magick-Ontology

Nothing is nothing; Nothing is nonexistence; Nowhere and a no time has nothing existed; Something has always existed everywhere; Nothing is made of nothing; Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere; Nothing is the cause of nothing; Something is the cause of everything; Everything has a cause; Something is self-causal; Everything is made of the self-causal that has always existed everywhere;

Everything is made of energy (mass-energy equivalence; E=mc^2) that has always existed (conservation of energy; ∑E=Ek+Ep) everywhere (zero-point energy; E=ħω/2); Eternal and omnipresent energy is all-power-full; Power is the transformation of energy (nature of power; P=∫∇Edv); Energy is the self-causal or is self-deterministic or teleological; Self-determinism is consciousness!

Therefore eternal and omnipresent energy may be hologically omniscient

To prove this, notice the following scientific fact;

there is an omnidirectional convergence of radiation into every single point in space i.e. there is an image of an omnidirectional perspective of the universe in every single point in space (in every frequency, spin, and momentum of energy but to varying degrees)

this is a type of hology

Therefore every form of energy is holomorphic

Therefore eternal and omnipresent energy is a holomorphism; Therefore, it has omnipotence.

To prove this, notice it solves the paradoxes;

(1) Energy cannot create a rock (a small form of energy) that more energy cannot lift, and

(2) Energy cannot destroy itself; power is the transformation of energy not the destruction of energy!

Reality is consciousness; Language is isomorphic to consciousness; To describe consciousness requires language; Thinking/Describing transforms consciousness; Consciousness is self-descriptive and self-deterministic.

From a pragmatic perspective, we need to find an engineering model for consciousness. I predict that future developments of quantum consciousness theory will find that quantum coherence or it's correlates are equal to kinetic energy and quantum decoherence or it's correlates are equal to potential energy; such that quantum recursion (the transformation between the two) amounts to consciousness or energy.

The existence of psychic functioning suggests that the brain may be a transceiver of consciousness; quantum recursion in the brain transduces the universe.

To prove this, notice the following studies on psychic functioning;

Synthetic Telepathy, Telekinesis, telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, biokinesis, coherence, and correlations.

Formal Proof

Biological Ontology

the hology produces spin and vortices because there is always local stars to promote the primary energy contribution to the spin harmonic; this compressive or injective or convergent energy reduces local stress vectors and stabilizes forms

the Law of Maximum Entropy Production may be the Telic Principle.

Maximum Entropy recursion may be Telic recursion.

Intelligent Invention and Evolutionary Design

engineering-to-universe mapping

(1) Universal Evolution or Universal Development is basically Intelligent Invention with Evolutionary Design, and (2) These inventions, cannot form from "chance" or happenstance; though the Evolutionary Designs may manifest from chance or happenstance!

Chance or happenstance may be produced from noise. In essence, our freewill may be our ability to cipher the noise into evolutionary design pathways, as humans are dynamic inventions where each state we exist in is a new evolutionary design (all foreseen adaptations according to our Creators intent/invention of us).

Theological ontology Prior Art

Ancient Religious Text has Prior Art in ontology

The eternal, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent consciousness-energy is a theological correlate (something that is structurally isomorphic to claims of Divinity);

“In him [Zeus] we have life and move and exist.”-Epimendies, Edict from Zeus.

“The Dao is the ground of all being.”-Loazi, Dao De Jing.

“Brahmin is the source of all material worlds, everything springs from him.”-Gita, Bagava.

“Jehovah himself fills the heavens and the earth.”-Jeremiah, Tanouck.

"Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one of them [stars] is missing"-Isaiah, Tanouck.

"...His... [qualities] are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power,.,"-Paul, Romans

In other words, it has the same properties as the Divine. By the identity of indescernibles, the axiom of extensionality, and the theory of theological correlation, this one thing is the Divine. Therefore the Divine necessarily and factually exists. QED.

Theory from Pure Observation

Assuming nothing but synonyms, negation of contradiction, contraposition, and scientific facts;

D; definition S; synonym Nc; negation of contradiction Cp; contraposition F; scientific fact C; conclusion

(1) F; "nothing exists" is "absurd"

(2) (1) Nc; "something exists" is "absolutely true"

(3) D and F; "time is a relationship of change between existing things"

(4) F and (1,2,3) C; "atleast two differentially changing things exist"

(5) F; "everywhere everything exists from prior states of the existence of things"

(6) (4,5) C; "nothing cannot have existed"

(7) (6) Nc; "something has always existed"

(8) F; "something exists everywhere"

(9) D, S, and F; spacetime or energy is measured by the duration (time) over distance (space)

(10) F; "energy exists"

(11) F; "every experiment ever constructed shows that everything is made of energy"

(12) (10,11) C; "monism exists"

(13) F; "every cause involves energy"

(14) (11,12,13) C; "energy is self-causal"

(15) S; "self-causal", "self-deterministic", and "teleological"

(16) S; "self-determinism" and "consciousness"

(17) (14,15,16) C; "energy is consciousness"

(18) F; "energy cannot be created nor destroyed"

(19) (7,18) C; "energy is eternal"

(20) F; "zero-point energy is in every single point in space"

(21) (8,20) C; "zero-point energy is omnipresent"

(22) (19,21) C; "zero-point energy is eternal and omnipresent"

(23) D and F; "power is the transformation of energy"

(24) (14,15,16,19,21) C; "eternal and omnipresent energy is omnipotent"

(25) (12,17,19,21,24) C; "consciousness is eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism"

(26) S; "conscious, eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism" and "God"

(27) (25,26) C; "God exists"

Metalogic from "nothing is not"

Metalogic is really simple. Did you know that metalogic is merely the generalizing of logical connectives? In other words, saying anything about a logical connective IS called metalogic! You will notice I say many things about these connectives. Well, all that logic is, is the generalizing of what can be said through the use of logical connectives. I use some of that too.

the word nothing exists

( |-∃!{}), Assuming nothing (i.e. having no non-logical axioms), it follows that there is an assuming, or thinking; And this particular thinking, amounts to the existence of one empty set or the word nothing.

nothing IS, not

Parmenides said "nothing IS, not" which means "nothing doesn't IS" or "IS" doesn't apply to nothing.

It is a scientific fact that nothing does not exist somewhere. And even if one had a superconducting box (which could remove magnetic fields) that one could remove all of the gases, photons and charged particles from; you would still have gravity, neutrinos, zero point energy, and quantum tunneling to deal with.

Four senses of “IS” can be meant;

generalization; identity (equivalents), [mankind IS homosapien]

implication (implies) [a man IS an animal]

predication (has the property of) [an orange IS the color orange]

existence; instantiation (exists as) [there IS truth]

Generalization has two antecedents;

Liken

Contrast

Which means;

Nothing likens not

Nothing contrasts not

Nothing generalizes not

Nothing implicates not

Nothing describes not

Nothing instantiates not

everything IS

The contraposition of "nothing IS not" is "everything IS" or "everything does IS" or "IS" applies to everything.

meaning;

everything likens => everything harmonizes => everything loves;

everything contrasts => everything informs => everything teaches;

everything generalizes => everything identifies => everything comprehends;

everything implicates => everything causes => everything reasons;

everything describes => everything communicates;

everything instantiates => everything generates => everything sustains;

one thing IS

IF everything IS (or likens, contrasts, generalizes, implicates, describes, and instantiates) then everything generalizes to one thing.

meaning;

one thing likens => one thing harmonizes => one thing loves;

one thing contrasts => one thing informs => one thing teaches;

one thing generalizes => one thing identifies => one thing comprehends;

one thing implicates => one thing causes => one thing reasons;

one thing describes => one thing communicates;

one thing instantiates => one thing generates => one thing sustains;

one thing self-IS

But this one thing, is also a thing, in other words it self-IS;

one thing self-likens => it self-harmonizes => it is autoimmune

one thing self-contrasts => it self-informs => it is an autodidact

one thing self-generalizes => it self-identifies => it is self-aware => it is sentient

one thing self-implicates => it is self-causal => it is self-deterministic => it is self-reasoning

one thing self-describes => it is self-interested

one thing self-instantiates => it is self-generating => it is self-sustaining => it is self-sufficient

one thing all-IS

It follows that "one thing self-IS" is "one thing all-IS"

meaning;

one thing all-likens => it all-unifies => it is omnibenevolent

one thing all-contrasts => it all-informs => it all-teaches

one thing all-generalizes => it all-identifies => it is all-aware => omniscient and omnipresent

one thing all-implicates => it is all-causal => it is all-deterministic => all-reasoning => all-wise

one thing all-describes => it is all-characteristics

one thing all-instantiates => omnipotent and eternal.

conclusions

The one thing is an autoimmune, autodidact, sentient, that is self-interested, self-sufficient, and omnibenevolent, making it an all-teacher, that is omniscient and omnipresent, and all-wise, as well as omnipotent and eternal.

Cybernetic Communication

(1)

(2) nothing

(3) there is the communication of the concept of nothing

(4) there is the realization of the communication of the concept of nothing

(5) there is the cybernetic loop involved in the realization of the communication of the concept of nothing

(6) there is the temporal stratification of the cybernetic loop involved in the realization of the communication of the concept of nothing

(7) there is the universe temporally stratified in the cybernetic loop involved in the realization of the communication of the concept of nothing

(8) there is God as the universe temporally stratified in the cybernetic loop involved in the realization of the communication of the concept of nothing

John Hagelin's theological derivation of the E8XE8 Heterotic Super String Theory

https://www.istpp.hagelin.org/manual.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPhgDfT4Zpc

John Hagelin shows material implications for many things about God from derivations of the superstring.

Jonathan Richard Emerson's Theory of Absolute Phenomena

https://www.thegproof.org/The-G-Proof.version.2.technical.paper.2013.05.28.pdf

Mark Laurence Donald Emerson's Theory of Phenomena and Causation

https://www.thegproof.org/The-G-Proof.version.1.technical.paper.2013.05.28.pdf

William Hatcher's Logical Proof of the Existence of God

https://william.hatcher.org/languages/english/a-logical-proof-of-the-existence-of-god

Baruch Spinoza's Ethics Of God Demonstrated in Geometric order

http://frank.mtsu.edu/~rbombard/RB/Spinoza/ethica1.html

substance is teleological

Spinoza is arguing for an ontological monism from Cartesian dualism; e.g. He claims the monistic substance or God is solely deterministic. The problem with that claim is that calling anything deterministic requires a dualistic or objective perspective (the observer is treated as separate from the deterministic phenomena he perceives) i.e. If God is deterministic, what external thing is God deterministic with respects? This of course is absurd for an ontological monism, as there is nothing external to God, and so God cannot be deterministic; God must be purely self-deterministic!; And self-determinism just so happens to be consciousness, or make God intrinsically teleological. [if you read Christopher Langan's CTMU, you may notice that I use some of his ideas to rebut Spinoza here.]

person of the Divine may include gods besides us

Further, Spinoza argues that because the ontological monism or God exists, there can be no other beings worthy of respect or reverence or adoration. i.e. He is arguing against all theistic notions of God, and that there cannot exist gods or angels merely because the ontological monism exists. This of course is pure fallacy, as monism no more disproves the existence of gods than it disproves the existence of mankind! And required in a monistic-pantheism perspective; any gods (and mankind) should naturally be characterized as the "person of the Divine".

Appendix B: evidence of God interacting with man

Deluge Geology, Radio Dating Inaccuracy, and Creative 'Days' (theory)

(1) the radioactive decay rate is NOT a constant; neutrino intensity definitely effects the radioactive decay rate. Note; The vast majority of sources say that neutrinos effect the radio decay rate, while only a few say that it has no or little effect. IF it has no effect; it would be the ONLY non-reversable microscopic phenomenon in existence!

The higher the neutrino intensity the lower the radioactive decay rate.

footnote; I have a hunch that lower radioactive decay rate is time dilation

(2) atmospheric electrons backscatter neutrinos increasing the intensity of neutrino radiation towards the earth (the atmosphere is a converging lens to neutrinos)

An Earth with a larger atmosphere (such as one that had all the oceanic water as a gas or plasma in a gigantic ionosphere) would increase the intensity of neutrino radiation towards the earth and given fact 1, lower the radioactive decay rate of radioisotopes.

(3) the continental plates fit together completely on a smaller Earth; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

(4) land fossils prove most of the Earth continental plates have been dry land

(5) on a smaller Earth (with all the continental plates put back together) the oceanic water would cover the entire Earth

(6) given fact 4, and 5, it follows that the oceanic water in the past was not on land (rather it must have been in the atmosphere so that it could fall to Earth).

(7) given fact 3, and 6, it follows that the Earth was smaller with a gigantic gaseous or plasma water canopy

(8) given fact 5, and 7, it follows that there was a global flood!!!

(9) but given 2, and 7, it follows that the radioactive decay rate was significantly lower before the flood

(10) given 9, the radio dating methods that assume constants in the radioactive decay rates are absolutely inaccurate (though still having good precision)

(11) the flood must be the last mass extinction event

(12) the K-T iridium aerosols [presumably from meteoroids] and any possible volcanic ash would have acted like cloud condensation nuclei, cloud seeding the deluge

(13) if God saved all the original animals in the Ark then the genera after the flood (notice blue line) matches the genera at Adam's creation (notice yellow line) proving God saved all the original animals; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Biodiversity-2.png

(14) If we assume that Adam was 44a when Eve was born and that the creative days are 221Ma (according to the dating inaccuracy) then a creative day is 9,500 years

Eve became the Mother of Seth at 86a. Genesis 5:3 Seth became the father of Enosh at 105. Genesis 5:6 Enosh became the father of Kenan at 90. Genesis 5:9 Cainan became the father of Mahalalel at 70. Genesis 5:12 Mahalalel became the father of Jared at 65. Genesis 5:15 Jared became the father of Enoch at 162. Genesis 5:18 Enoch became the father of Methuselah at 65. Genesis 5:21 Methuselah became the father of Lamech at 187. Genesis 5:25 Lamech became the father of Noah at 182. Genesis 5:28 The Flood started when Noah was 600. Genesis 7:6

(86+105+90+70+65+162+65+187+182+600)=1612a of creative day seven [Eve's creation to the flood]

1612a*221/37.5=9500 [this is a creative day]

Fifth day

510 Ma the first fish, the jawless ostracoderms.

410 Ma the first fish with jaws, the acanthodians.

365 Ma the tetrapods.

350 Ma the dragonfly (the first flying creatures were insects).

340 Ma the amniotes.

And God went on to say: Let the waters swarm forth a swarm of living souls and let flying creatures fly over the earth upon the face of the expanse of the heavens. And God proceeded to create the great monsters and every living soul that moves about, which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds, and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. ... And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a fifth day. (Genesis 1:20-23)

Surprisingly enough, the flying creatures in this verse is not birds (as many may have thought), rather, it is insects!

Sixth day

285 Ma the therapsids.

230 Ma the dinosaurs.

225 Ma the first true mammals, Gondwanadon tapani or Morganucodon watsoni.

150 Ma the first bird, Archaeopteryx.

And God went on to say: Let the earth put forth living souls according to their kinds, domestic animal and moving animal and wild beast of the earth according to its kind. And it came to be so. And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. (Genesis 1:24, 25)

As you can see this work clarified our understanding of the bible (first flying creatures are insects) and the creation of the other animals matches the day of their biblical creation

(15) since the creation of Eve to the present it's been about 6000a

(16) Tyranusourus Rex fossils are dated between the creation of Eve and the date of the Flood; somewhere around 800a of creative day seven or ~5,200 years ago (inaccurately dated to 80Ma)

https://s.hdnux.com/photos/10/17/62/2161798/6/1200x0.jpg

https://www.science.org/cms/10.1126/science.1108397/asset/f350e639-3ffd-48d9-a488-2dfa943596dd/assets/graphic/307_1952_f2.jpeg

How old is this T. Rex blood and soft tissue? 5,200 years old or 80 MILLION years old?

I predict that the soft tissue found in T. Rex bone will Carbon 14 date to around 5,200 years old!

This will verify my theory about the Deluge Geology, Radio Dating Inaccuracy, and Creative 'Days'.

That said, how could man, birds, and land animals have survived the deluge?

According to the bible (and over a hundred of other ancient sources), there was a great flood that destroyed the ancient world, for which, the gods spared some men and animals.

Jehovah claimed to cause the flood. In any cause we must grant at least the existence of advanced extraterrestrials (or gods exist or even that God exists) such that they could have spared some men, otherwise, mankind and all the animals on land could not have possibly survived such an event.

Ron Wyatt found a formation in the mountains of Ararat of petrified wood in the shape of a boat having the same length as described of the Ark in the Bible; https://i.pinimg.com/originals/55/8a/cb/558acb1d59f1dab953c3fcaa16cc2670.jpg

Discussion;

Birds are not spoken of in the creative days as flying creatures because the first birds originally did not strictly fly about; "Gliding, not strong flight: Fossil evidence suggests that Archaeopteryx and other early birds had weaker feathers and skeletal structures that were not strong enough for sustained, powered flight, but were likely capable of gliding between trees or other high points. Flight developed later: Powered flight developed over time, with some ancient birds evolving the flight-friendly feather structures of modern birds later in the Cretaceous period."-Google AI

The Ark found by Ron Wyatt is located at the base of the mountains of Ararat, not "on" them (as is otherwise so translated). But no worries, the word translated "on" can actually be translated as "among, at, or touching".

Radiative mechanism for gravitation (including of thrust, anti-gravity, inertial dampening, and artificial gravity)

I believe in a radiative mechanism for gravitation which means my position is electromagnetically engineerable for thrust, anti-gravity, and artificial gravity.

What is the current scientific consensus? "mass causes warping of spacetime", so my question is; HOW do you engineer it without a radiative mechanism???

Here is how I came to my conclusion one fact at a time;

(1) neutrino intensity effects the radio active decay rate (this is required/predicted because every 'other' microscopic phenomena is reversable) and therefore it effects the radio dating methods (that currently falsely assume constants in radio decay rate);

(2) most interpretations of genesis suggest that the fossil record is not millions of years old

(3) atmospheric and lithospheric lensing (and concentration) of neutrinos was higher before the flood if the flood waters are currently in the ocean but were in the atmosphere, as a larger atmosphere is a larger lens and therefore a higher concentrator of neutrinos; this proves the radio dating methods are inaccurate if the flood is true!

(4) the continental plates fit together completely on a smaller earth, so the question is what is the mechanism by which the core of the earth could have expanded to break up the surface crust?

(5) if neutrinos induce someone similar to the AC Kerr effect where they warp the vacuum refractive index, then they induce length contraction according to intensity; I claim the orbitosphere (or matter) is [similar to] a Kerr-induced self-focusing refraction curvature stabilized vortex of scalar, longitudinal, and transverse radiation. One of the results being that as the vacuum refractive index increases, the Bohr radius shrinks [metaphor; imagine an electron orbiting an atom at a particular velocity and orbital frequency, if you slow the velocity (by increasing the refractive index) the orbit length would have to shrink to maintain the same orbital frequency] i.e. LENGTH CONTRACTION according to altitude.

https://brilliantlightpower.com/book-download-and-streaming/

(6) the higher intensity of the neutrinos due to higher lensing effects of a larger atmosphere; length contracted the core of the earth producing a smaller earth where all the continental plates fit together before the flood

(7) Therefore, this is a scientific theory of the flood with an engineerable radiative mechanism to verify the theory.

(8) if matter length contracts moving into higher refractive index (higher neutrino intensity) then the mass of matter thus shrinks, but mass-energy is conserved therefore there is the creation of kinetic energy or thrust down the gradient i.e. gravity

https://web.archive.org/web/20230128155849/http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/gravity/index.html

(9) "Neutrinos,... longitudinal characteristics... longitudinal massless states and specific energy wave theories that treat them as fundamental wave centers. ... certain theoretical models and experimental observations of "longitudinal" momentum imbalance during interactions suggest they possess unique longitudinal properties. Chirality & Spin: Neutrinos... are always "polarized" in the direction of their motion, a feature sometimes likened to longitudinal waves. Alternative Theories: Some models, like Energy Wave Theory (EWT), propose neutrinos are fundamental, spherical wave centers that produce longitudinal energy. Experimental Evidence: Experiments look at "longitudinal kinematic imbalances" in interactions, finding unique directional properties that differ from simple transverse wave models, suggesting deeper longitudinal aspects."

-google AI

(10) if electromagnetic induced longitudinal waves are isomorphic to neutrinos then thrust and anti-gravity is electromagnetic engineerable.

Anyway, neutrinos have a scalar wave, longitudinal, and transverse components. if you can create a gradient with these individually or mixed then you should be able to create thrust; as a neutrino gradient clearly induces gravity (thrust) because the earth converges enough neutrinos to create a shadow induced thrust.

neutrinos may induce or are the "spin carrier" (akin to the charge carrier), therefore a spin carrier density (webers per cubic meter) gradient induces thrust!

Matter is self-focusing refraction curvature stabilized vortices of neutrinos that can only exist in a matter gradient and neutrino 'bath'

Since neutrinos have a transverse component and transverse radiation induces the AC Kerr effect then neutrinos must induce something similar to the AC Kerr effect.

Matter can only exist in a gradient because the neutrino (shadowing) gradient induces gravity and thus creates the matter vortex! As a vortex lowers or minimizes the force of a gradient through energy flow (all vortices exist due to an energy gradient) thus stabilizing it's form.

This materially implies that the first creation of matter required the existence of at least two atoms of matter to stabilize there form if there was a 'bath' of neutrinos!

This also implies that before stars existed neutrinos existed.

This may imply that the eyes of Jehovah (which are in every place) are neutrinos. This may suggest that neutrinos are eternal or CONSERVED unless Jehovah evolved eyes! But the only thing that is in every place that is 'part' of Jehovah's body in scripture is his eyes. There may be nothing but neutrinos in existence Michel (electron neutrino), Gabriel (muon neutrino), and Azazel (tau neutrino)!

There may be only three different kinds of fundamental radiative (energy) waves.

Scalar (right handed) waves may be electron neutrino - tau neutrino vortices; God the Father; four beings

Longitudinal (straight) waves may be electron neutrino - muon neutrino vortices; Logos the Son; ten beings

Transverse (left handed) waves may be muon neutrino - tau neutrino vortices; Holy Spirit; myriad of beings

Scalar-Longitudinal-Transverse wave ... atoms; Man

These vortices may be a type of cybernetically interactive memory ("memory" because flowing state of dynamic equilibrium) of energy.

Time-per-space instead of "spacetime"

energy = time-per-space = consciousness (quantum recursion) = God

I know that Randell Mills equates spacetime with energy, but I have a hunch that energy is measured by the duration (time) over distance (space).

IF that is true, then “time-per-space” would be a more accurate expression of the concept instead of “spacetime”, and this would amount to a quality of computation potential possibilities.

How is this realized? By the vacuum refractive index gradients. There is more time per space in higher energy density than lower energy density…. as I hunch that all energy forms are electromagnetic in nature, then this energy density may induce something similar to the AC Kerr effect.

lower energy density has slower velocity of light and lower energy of light; therefore less inertia

higher energy density has faster velocity of light and higher energy of light; therefore more inertia

Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (hypothesis)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sodom.jpg

Locations identified on the satellite map on the west coast of the Dead Sea have millions of high purity (98% pure) sulfur balls with burn rings embedded in what looks like the ashen remains of cities. The picture on the bottom right is in the location identified on the map as Gomorrah.

Spectra Chem Analytical of New Zealand, and Galbrath Lab of Texas; Two independent laboratories have tested the sulfur balls and sulfur ash determining their composition.

At least three different groups have surveyed the sites taking samples, and two of those groups have created videos. Here is a video from one of them;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

It should be noted;

(1) volcanic activity turns sulfur into a gas,

(2) meteoroids contain only small amounts of sulfur,

(3) geothermal activity creates only yellow sulfur,

(4) a natural gas explosion wouldn't explain the purity of the sulfur balls, and

(5) bacteria wouldn't explain the burn rings on the sulfur balls nor the ashen remains.

An alternative possibility is that the pure sulfur fire balls were created and used as military munitions in warfare. However, there is no record of using such munitions in warfare. It should be noted that the cities are completely destroyed with even the structural material and stones having been turned into ash. It would take far less sulfur to simply kill the people; turning all of the structural material and stones into ash is militarily unfeasible.

Given that the pure sulfur fire balls and ashen remains are not known to be created by any volcanic, meteoric, geothermal, natural gas, or bacterial activity, and given that it is historically unprecedented to use pure sulfur fire balls as munitions and militarily unfeasible to turn all the structural material and stones of the cities into ash, and given that there are records claiming the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was by the hand of the person of the Divine, it therefore suggests the existence of the fact that this is the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah, the destruction of which was a teleological interaction of the Divine with man.

Neanderthal violence

Correlation of evidence of Neanderthal violence with Scriptural History

http://www.donsmaps.com/images4/neanderthalsapiens.jpg

The first reconstruction of a complete Neanderthal skeleton in 2005 has revealed more accurately the similarities and differences between us (far right) and them.

The reconstruction makes clear their larger, bell-like chest cavity and wider pelvis. They are physically larger (both taller and bigger than humans), with stronger muscles, larger nose hole and eye sockets, as well as a larger brain cavity.

Neanderthal practiced cannibalism or ritual defleshing. Neanderthals seemed to suffer a high frequency of fractures, especially common on the ribs, the femur, fibulae, spine, and skull; as well as from trauma such as stab wounds and blows to the head; suggesting a high level of physical violence.

"Consequently Jehovah saw that the badness of man was abundant in the earth and every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only bad all the time. And Jehovah felt regrets that he had made men in the earth, and he felt hurt at his heart. So Jehovah said: “I am going to wipe men whom I have created off the surface of the ground, from man to domestic animal, to moving animal and to flying creature of the heavens, because I do regret that I have made them." (Genesis 6:1-2, 4-7)

"In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on this day all the springs of the vast watery deep were broken open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. And the downpour upon the earth went on for forty days and forty nights." (Genesis 7:11-12) Second month Following the Exodus from Egypt, when Jehovah gave the Israelites the sacred calendar, this became the eighth month, known as Bul, corresponding to the latter half of October and first half of November. - New World Translation Footnote Genesis 7:11 The global flood which killed all but eight humanoids is said to have occurred on the same dating associated with the Festival of the Dead, for which the European calendar marks the celebrations of All Hollows Eve, and All Souls' Day

Cushite confusion

After the flood a Cushite named Nimrod rebelled against Jehovah; creating cities (Jehovah commanded everyone to spread out).

He is called a "king". A king is ruler of a kin (Cushites) which has a kingdom (in this case Summeria; was the first after the flood). Akkadians called Cushites "Summerians" which translates as "black headed people".

As a punishment Jehovah confused their languages!

Africa has more than 2000 languages. Where as Europe and Asia only have less then 200 each.

Brown people also have significantly smaller brains and considerably lower IQ.

Brown people (Cushites) sometimes have a hard time speaking simple English, instead they tend to speak Ebonics.

Coconut is the tree of life

The mitochondria oxidizes for energy production whereas the cell body ferments for energy production; the oxidization is 20 times more efficient than fermentation.

The mitochondria also control many crucial aspects of cell regulation, including cell death.

When the mitochondria are down regulated, or most of the energy of the cell is produced from cell body fermentation, then not only is their reduced energy, the mitochondria no longer have the ability to kill the cell.

Cancer is run away cell body fermentation where the mitochondria can't kill the cell.

Coconut has medium chain triglycerides such as lauric acid which are antibacterial, antifungal, and pro-mitochondrial.

Eating coconut oil also increases or promotes ketosis which is proven to have health benefits.

In other words, there is considerable evidence that extended life is impossible without coconut.

Serpent hind legs

Moses claimed that the serpent was cursed to go about on it's belly... presumably instead of walking on legs.

ancient fossils prove that serpents had hind legs.

If I am not mistaken the theory of evolution claimed in the past that the serpent was first and then developed legs on land creating the lizards. But the serpent only had hind legs!

Survey about "God is love"

the Apostle Paul says in the bible that "God is love", well, to put that to the test I posted an internet survey on Myspace religion and philosophy forum; titled "loveless atheists" and "godless atheists"

In the thread I asked if atheists love everyone; every single atheist posting mentioned that they only loved a few people;

so my argument is that if someone really knows God, then they actually love everyone (as I do), and since atheists don't know God they would only love a few at most; and this demonstrates a material implication that God is love.

update;

I feel sorry for my enemies, and intend good for everyone.

"love" may be a confusing word. Jesus told us to Agape (love) our enemies. I don't really know what agape means, but I do not appreciate, adore, or revere my enemies. so I do not love them.

On the other hand I feel sorry for them... so that is Pathos, not Agape.

But I do intend good for all. So if Agape means or materially implies intention of good or feeling sorry for someone, then God is Love.

Prophecy of the kingdoms of Palestine

Here is what I have researched from history/watchtower/possibilities with respects to correlation with prophecy.

Sumerian (Cush Hamitic)

Hittite (Canaan Hamitic)

Akkadian (Elam Shemitic)

1. Egyptian (Mizriam Hamitic) [Joseph, Moses]

2. Assyrian (Ashur Shemitic) [Isaiah, Jerimiah, Ezekial]

3. Babylonian (Arphaxad Shemitic) [Shadrak, Meshek, Abendigo, Daniel]

4. Persian (Madai Japhetic) [Esther, Mordecai, Ezra]

5. Greecan (Javan Japhetic) [Maccabees]

6. Roman (Tubal Japhetic) [Tobit]

book of Daniel; legs of iron; to destroy the Temple, and the Messiah will be 'left with nothing'

7. Roman and Christian [Einstein, Tesla, Ford, ...]

book of Daniel; feet of iron and clay

Paul said that a christian has to be a jew or a greek.

8. vigin male Israeli 144,000

book of Revelations; to spring from the seven kingdoms; notice [Isrealis] co-ruled the seven kingdoms.

Apocalypse 17:10-12

And there are seven kings; [at the time of writing Revelations] five have fallen (Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece), one is (Rome), and the other (Roman and Christian) has not yet arrived.... And the wild beast that was but is not (Israel; at that time Israel was destroyed), it is also an eighth king, but springs from the seven [as in, they were part of the kingdoms]

There is also ten horns or ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom; The watchtower says this is the United Nations, but I suspect that it is the Frontier Research Enterprise Ecclesia.

But then again there is a fiery colored beast that everyone says no one can defeat. Is this England? as they have never been defeated??? and they gave life to the image of the beast that had the death stroke (Israel)???

book of Revelations; to bring down the fire of heaven in the sight of mankind; nuclear bombs?

Maybe the after most of mankind moves to other planets the Christians will rule earth.

Moral social strategy involved in "give to the poor"

Jesus said "give to the poor", if we make sure the poor have food and shelter, then it will be less likely for them to steal from others or to needlessly suffer. Having this intent creates fellow feeling and good will in society.

Frontier Research Enterprise Ecclesia

The FREE, a perfect government/religion?!

https://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/User:HumbleBeauty/FREE

The Exodus Decoded (speculation)

The plagues of Egypt may have been associated with the volcanic eruption of Santorini during the reign of Ahmose I, resulting in the migration of the Hyksos from Egypt to Palestine.

Appendix C; disproof of falsehoods

false religion

The belief in the Supreme Being as a humanoid on some throne is false. Jesus said "...heaven is God's throne" (Matthew 5:34). In this scripture heaven is obviously not some chair that a humanoid sits on. Isaiah (6:1), Ezekiel (1), Daniel (7:9), 1 Kings (22:19), if taken literally would confuse Israelis leading them to false conceptions of God. While anthropomorphism of God is a falsehood, we shouldn't deny the possibility of advanced extraterrestrials or gods or angels.

Ex nihilo creation or the teaching that God created existence from nothing is not found in the bible and is absolutely false. "From nothing, nothing comes". God can not create himself (energy cannot be created), and to create requires that God creates from something that already exists (which is God).

false philosophy

Dualism and Pluralism are false, because energy is one morphism in other words monism is true. And materialism is false because things such as light and neutrinos also exist (not just matter exists).

And physicalism may be a confusion;

What is "physical"? 3-space local realism at no greater than the speed of light.

Then the nonphysical or 'spiritual' could be; >3 space dimensions, superluminal speed (or tachyons), and quantum entanglement (instantaneous interaction at a distance)? At least one of these conditions is true. Higher dimensions are predicted by all string theories, tachyons are predicted by some extensions of standard physics, and quantum entanglement is currently viewed as a verified phenomenon of quantum physics.

By 'physical' many equivocate to mean 'natural', which means involving scientific causation or dare I say understandable in terms of some form of mechanics (or being engineerable).

In conclusion, the correct ontological philosophy is; monism-spiritualism-naturalism.

false science

I have heard that some believe a big bang created energy. If energy can be created in a big bang, there must be some conceivable mechanism to replicate the process. But every process of physics so far experimented on can't create energy. Science does not include none replicable phenomena. Therefore any such theories of none replicable phenomenon are pseudoscience; On the other hand, a "big bang" may have created matter, as matter can be created, and obviously was created, where energy prior to matter was in another form!

false logics

I have been told that "nothing can't imply nothing" from a few atheists. According to all Artificial Intelligence I have sampled, "nothing implies nothing" is true. Anyway, here is my proof;

I know you will grant that "nothing is nothing" and therefore "nothing equals nothing".

This is the law of identity and therefore the biconditional; ↔

proof; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_extensionality#In_ZF_set_theory

∀x∀y[∀z((z∈x)↔(z∈y))]↔(x=y)

let x={}, y={}, z={}

therefore [({}∈{})↔({}∈{})]↔({}={})

If (({}∈{})↔({}∈{}) then ({}↔{})

therefore [[({}∈{})↔({}∈{})]↔({}={})]∧[[({}∈{})↔({}∈{})]→({}↔{})]

therefore ({}={})↔[({}∈{})↔({}∈{})]→({}↔{})

therefore [({}={})→({}↔{})]

Therefore you must grant that {}↔{}

Now if the conditional can go both ways, it therefore is materially equivalent to going one way; →

Therefore you must grant {}→{}

In other words ({}is{})→({}={})→({}↔{})→({}→{})

Appendix D: Arguments for God's existence

Beauty

Snowflakes, crystals, flowers, liquid water, and beautiful women exist.

Morality

Moral values exist.

Majority Consent

There is near-universal belief in a higher power across different cultures.

Natural Laws

There is governing laws and existing order in the Universe.

Brian Activity

Periaqueductal Gray (PAG): A brainstem region, identified in a 2021 study as central to a circuit that, when damaged, correlates with decreased spirituality.

Reward Circuitry: Spiritual feelings activate the nucleus accumbens, similar to effects from music, love, or drugs.

Prefrontal Cortex: The medial and ventromedial areas are involved in the cognitive, emotional, and self-referential aspects of religious belief.

Other Areas: The precuneus, anterior insula, and anterior cingulate cortex also show increased activity during religious thought.

Pragmatic Warrant

Mystical experiences are life-transformative in a way that is significant, positive and lasting. The people who have these experiences not only do not exhibit traditional signs of mental illness but, often, are in better mental and physical health than the general population due to the experience.

Appendix E: positive feedback

Ethan Anderson; Based

Charles Brocka; Amen!

Clyde Sutherland; Thanks

Ubaid Arain; Fabulous!!! ❤️🙏👍

Catherine Chapman; interesting!

Steve Smith; Articulate.

Ryan Matus; Good stuff man.

Ron Dixon; absolutely true...

Nasereddin Algeballi; Thanks for this...

John J. Bradley; Thanks for this!

Lungelo Lungs; That's very cool

James Mamba; wow this is deep!

David Daly; Thank you for the info

Lou Sandler; It is somewhat impressive...

Elaine Miller; Thanks for sharing that.

Daniel Vasareczki; ...That is most intriguing

Taylor Page; This is certainly interesting.

Montrell Lotson; Yes! Science points to God!

Leland Oki; ...I just read every word, thanks

Sandeep Kumar Verma; I appreciate your intelligence...

NiloFar Qureshi; Really awesome proof you gave.

Dylan Ryshak; I like your logic in your proofs...

Laird Jimmy; ...it's pretty neat and I do like it

Vincent Pellerin; It is an interesting interpretation

Dale A Herrington; everything every where all at once. Nice.

Troy Melendez; Interesting shit, thanks for sharing it with me

Matthew Williams; Thank you, Mars. You are truly special. ...Thank you brother.

Mohamed Ibrahim; brilliant and i very much hope atheists learn from this write-up

Greg Spung; This is an interesting perspective with valuable insight. Thank you for sharing!

Don Meek Donatomeek; i love you and your reply... love this thanks so much and yes GOD is nature...

Kanyiso Madaka; I love this Reply and I agree with it completely. I will save it for myself...

Mike Wilson; Well, to be honest, it's actually pretty decent. ...a lot of it is sound, from a technical perspective.

Ko Constant; Thank you for sharing. One of the best things I've read in decades. The closest one can come to finding a rational objective "proof" ...

Linda Wagner; Thanks for explaining your much believed discoveries. May they somehow lead you to truth. I have never heard of Universalist before. Interesting thoughts but very complex.

John Maya Sr.; Exactly. What we know must and does exist as we observe it's effects has the same priorities of the Biblical God. The Biblical God exists by definition of what is clearly understood to exist.

Madeline Dixon; Sure. If two things have identical properties, they are the same. You are saying energy and God have the same definition, thus if energy exists God must exist. I love it, it’s really a good argument.

Tim Long; I was particularly interested in your analysis of self -implication and self causal. As a matter of fact, the whole logical analysis was awe inspiring... I look forward to reviewing it again. Thanks!

Jeff Tzounos; That is an awesome read, I won't claim to understand everything that is written, but, I got the gist of it, I've downloaded them and read them more thoroughly, Thanks for that, I'll send them to some of my devil dodger mates.

John Lengyel; ...It was very good 👍 I enjoyed reading it. Thank you for the information ℹ️ ...Mars my friend, I hope I can call you a ... friend. You’re too highly intelligent, you’re writing ✍️ is way over most peoples heads I can follow Most of your writing but it’s too intelligent.

Ron Davis; Breathtaking logic indeed... After referencing your link, I see that you are a true Analytical philosopher... ...I recognized your impressive abstract logic in determining the existence of YHWH... Your “proof” pretty much moves “reality” seamlessly from the empirical to the very essence of YHWH, Which to me is necessarily meta-empirical... ...I find myself... standing in open-mouthed admiration at your command of logic. ...Baruch Hashem.🙏

Credits

Heraclitus said change is the fundamental principle of reality first

Parmenides said nothing is not first

Socrates gave the law of identity

Spinoza proved monism first

Descartes attempted to assume nothing first

Leibniz gave the identity of indisernibles

Max Planck said that a conscious and intelligent mind is the matrix of all matter

Victor Hugo said nothing is nothing first

Ron Wyatt discovered unique sulfur balls embedded in ashen remains of what looks like ancient cities, as well as petrified wood in the shape of a boat the size of Noah's Ark near the mountains of Ararat

Kent Hovind said that Dinosaurs existed at the same time as man

John Hagelin said that the zero-point field is consciousness

Wayne Dyer said that energy is eternal and is God first

Christopher Langan attempted to prove that Reality is self-descriptive and self-deterministic through a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language first

Mars Sterling Turner wrote this page including deriving the proofs